By Hla Myet Chell (International Law)
AS the global geopolitical order evolves towards a more multipolar framework, one of the most significant developments is the proliferation of smaller regional coalitions. These alliances, characterized by their focused and often localized nature, are increasingly regarded as essential mechanisms for countries to protect their sovereignty, pursue shared economic and security objectives, and navigate the complexities of a rapidly transforming global power structure. While traditional global institutions such as the United Nations (UN) and the European Union (EU) continue to play important roles, the formation of these smaller, region-specific groupings is becoming a defining feature of modern international relations.
Transition to Multipolarity and the Rise of Focused Alliances
The world is gradually shifting away from a unipolar global system dominated by a singular superpower towards a more multipolar order, where several regional powers exert significant influence. The theoretical framework of structural realism, particularly as articulated by Kenneth Waltz, posits that in a multipolar environment, states are more inclined to form alliances based on shared security concerns and economic interests. Smaller, more targeted coalitions allow states to focus on pressing regional challenges – such as trade, security, climate change, and infrastructure – without being overshadowed by the rivalries between global superpowers. These compact alliances offer enhanced flexibility, allowing states to respond rapidly and effectively to immediate concerns.
Southeast Asia: A Paradigm of Regional Cooperation
Southeast Asia offers a compelling illustration of the rise of focused regional alliances. Strategically situated between the Indian and Pacific Oceans, the region has historically been a theater of geopolitical competition, particularly between the United States and China. Countries such as Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand are compelled to balance economic partnerships with China while maintaining security ties with the United States, leading to a delicate diplomatic balancing act.
China’s rapid economic ascendancy has led many Southeast Asian nations to strengthen their engagement with Beijing, particularly through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which facilitates trade, infrastructure development, and investment. Nevertheless, these countries, despite their economic dependence on China, also maintain substantial security relationships with the US, as evidenced by longstanding agreements like the US-Philippines Mutual Defence Treaty and the US-Thailand Security Cooperation Agreement. These arrangements ensure a US military presence in the region, which serves as a counterweight to China’s expanding influence.
To navigate this complex geopolitical terrain, many Southeast Asian countries have increasingly turned to smaller, more compact groups such as the Ayeyawady-Chao Phraya-Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy (ACMECS) and the Cambodia-Laos-Vietnam Development Triangle Area (CLV-DTA). These alliances address specific regional issues, including infrastructure, trade, and security, allowing countries to collaborate on critical matters without becoming embroiled in the broader geopolitical rivalry between the US and China. The rise of such smaller associations underscores the region’s preference for pragmatic, issue-based cooperation, rather than broad geopolitical alignment.
The Global Phenomenon of Regional Alliances
The trend towards the formation of smaller regional groups is not confined to Southeast Asia; it is a global phenomenon. Around the world, countries are increasingly opting for these coalitions to address regional challenges without being drawn into the larger, often destabilizing, power struggles between global superpowers.
Europe: The Rise of Regional Groupings in Response to EU Challenges
In Europe, smaller alliances have gained prominence as countries seek to assert their national interests, particularly in areas where broader EU policies may not align with their priorities. Notable examples include the Visegrád Group – comprising the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia – which has taken a more assertive stance on issues such as immigration and economic integration, challenging EU consensus. Likewise, the Nordic-Baltic Alliance, which includes Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and the Baltic states, focuses on security cooperation and regional stability in response to perceived threats, particularly from Russia.
These smaller groupings enable countries to address specific challenges in a more flexible and responsive manner, which is often not feasible within the larger, more bureaucratic EU framework. The emergence of such alliances reflects the growing desire for greater autonomy and adaptability in a rapidly changing geopolitical environment.
The Middle East: Fragmentation and Regional Realignment
In the Middle East, smaller alliances have emerged in response to longstanding regional power struggles, particularly between Saudi Arabia and Iran. The Abraham Accords, which saw Israel normalize diplomatic relations with the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco, represent a significant shift in the region’s geopolitical landscape, fostering cooperation in areas such as security, trade, and political alignment. Similarly, the Arab Quartet, consisting of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Egypt, was formed to counter Qatar’s growing regional influence and present a unified stance against perceived destabilizing forces.
These smaller groupings provide a mechanism for countries in the region to pursue specific geopolitical and economic interests, while mitigating the influence of external powers, such as Iran and Turkiye, which often play a disruptive role in regional affairs.
Africa: Regional Cooperation as a Solution to Local Challenges
In Africa, smaller alliances such as the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the East African Community (EAC) have proven instrumental in addressing a range of local challenges, including conflict resolution, economic integration, and trade facilitation. These regional organizations allow member states to collaborate on security issues, promote economic growth, and manage natural resources effectively, offering solutions that are more tailored to local contexts than broader global organizations might provide.
Given the political instability, terrorism, and economic challenges facing many African states, these smaller alliances are increasingly viewed as essential for addressing the region’s most pressing concerns.
Latin America: Fragmented Alliances in a Politically Diverse Region
In Latin America, political fragmentation has led to the formation of smaller alliances that reflect the region’s diverse political landscape. The Pacific Alliance, which includes Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru, is primarily focused on economic integration and trade, while the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA), which includes Venezuela and Bolivia, espouses anti-imperialist and socialist ideals. These groupings allow countries to pursue their respective political and economic goals, providing platforms for cooperation amid the region’s political fragmentation.
Asia-Pacific: Strategic Partnerships and Balancing Global Powers
In the Asia-Pacific, smaller alliances are increasingly common, as countries seek to balance relations with both regional powers and global superpowers. The Quad (United States, Japan, India, and Australia), for example, is a strategic alignment designed to promote a free and open Indo-Pacific, particularly in response to China’s growing influence. Additionally, regional organizations such as the South Pacific Islands Forum provide smaller Pacific island nations with a platform to collaborate on issues such as climate change, security, and sustainable development, while managing their relationships with global powers like the US, China, and Australia.
The Promise and Perils of Smaller Alliances
The formation of smaller regional alliances offers significant advantages, as well as notable risks. From the perspectives of international political economy and realist theory, these alliances provide countries with the opportunity to assert their autonomy and pursue specific economic, political, or security goals without being constrained by larger, more bureaucratic organizations. They facilitate faster decision-making and more effective responses to regional challenges.
However, smaller pacts are not without their drawbacks. One of the primary concerns is the potential for regional instability. These groupings can become arenas for great power competition, particularly when external powers use them to counterbalance each other’s influence. Furthermore, smaller alliances may struggle to maintain cohesion over time, especially when member states have divergent priorities. This lack of unity can limit the effectiveness of these groupings in addressing long-term regional issues. Moreover, such alliances may marginalize countries that are excluded, leading to feelings of exclusion and inequality.
Conclusion: Smaller Regional Alliances as Catalysts in a Multipolar Global Order
The rise of smaller regional alliances is a defining feature of the emerging multipolar world order. Countries are increasingly turning to focused coalitions to address regional issues and safeguard their national interests. While these alliances present valuable opportunities for cooperation, they also carry risks of fragmentation, instability, and external interference. As the global geopolitical environment continues to evolve, smaller regional groups will play a critical role in shaping future international relations. Nations will need to navigate the delicate balance between cooperation and competition within these groupings to effectively manage the complexities of the modern world.
References;
• Waltz, K (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.
• Mearsheimer, JJ (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton & Company.
• Chaturvedi, S, & Singh, S (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative and Southeast Asia: Opportunities and Challenges. Asian Economic Policy Review, 14(2), 217-233.
• ASEAN Secretariat. (2020). ASEAN Regional Cooperation and Integration. Retrieved from https://asean.org
• Dittmer, L, & Kim, HJ (2020). The Rise of Smaller Alliances in Southeast Asia: Balancing China and the US. Asian Security Studies Journal, 34(1), 45-68.
• Tunsjø, Ø (2021). The Security of the Asia-Pacific Region: China’s Growing Influence and US Responses. Oxford University Press.
• Goldstein, A (2005). Rising China and the East Asian Order. World Politics, 57(1), 58-97.
• Sahay, R, & Jain, A. (2017). The Visegrád Group and Its Role in European Politics. Journal of European Integration Studies, 17(3), 45-63.
• Rabi, NS (2020). Regional Cooperation in Africa: The Role of ECOWAS and the EAC in Addressing Conflicts. African Journal of Political Science, 19(2), 123-138.
• Nye, JS (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.
• Hirsch, A, & O’Loughlin, B (2018). Middle East Geopolitics: Power, Politics, and Regional Alliances. Routledge.
• Bajpai, K, & Raj, R (2019). The Strategic Impact of the Quad in the Indo-Pacific. Asian Security Review, 22(4), 304-325.
• World Bank. (2020). Infrastructure and Economic Development in Southeast Asia: Trends and Future Directions. Washington, DC: World Bank.
• Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). (2021). Global Trends: Regional Power Shifts and the Rise of New Alliances. Retrieved from https://cfr.org
