By Moe Myint
(CONTINUED FROM YESTERDAY)
Foundations and lobby groups that have betrayed for the sake of money
However, his thoughts and actions were not in harmony with Myanmar’s politics, religion, and culture. Due to the influx of dollar donations favouring the opposition, Myanmar’s political situation became even more chaotic, leading to the deterioration of the country. It is evident that the true intention behind the so-called support for democracy was to systematically wedge Myanmar’s society, ultimately aiming for the complete destruction and collapse of both the State and the entire society.
Since 1994, most of the scholars produced by the Burma Project have primarily served as resources to oppose the Myanmar government and to destabilize and destroy Myanmar. The headquarters of the Burma Project is OSI (Open Society Institute), and through the Open Society Foundation, established by George Soros, illicit funds flow to NGOs, INGOs, CSOs, and media organizations in Myanmar and other countries.
In Myanmar, it is known as Open Society Myanmar (OSM). There were a total of six interactions, both domestically and internationally, between Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and George Soros senior and junior. Illegal financial activities refer to the depositing and withdrawal of foreign currencies into and from Myanmar banks without reporting to the government, whether through OSM or OSF (Open Society Foundations). The situation worsens if those foreign entities are involved with DCS (Disloyal Civil Servants) movements. In this context, it was found that although the Daw Khin Kyi Foundation, led by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi as Chairperson in 2013, was established as a domestic charitable social organization, it also engaged in political activities. Without being able to properly document banking transactions, it has been observed that all the foundation’s funds were transferred by Moe Zaw Oo from the NUG (National Unity Government), showing that the funds were used for subversive activities.
There have been criticisms directed at the foundation regarding the use of domestic and international donations, both in ways unrelated to its original objectives — education, health, and social sectors — as well as regarding the use of State-owned land and property. Looking at the Myanmar Disloyalty Civil Servant (DCS) movement, it is evident that every successful revolutionary movement around the world relies heavily on the financial resources provided by supporting organizations.
Because of the lure of money alone, many popular artistes, charity organizations, influencers, and media groups are actively lobbying for a national destruction plan. Famous artistes have been pressured with massive amounts of money — millions of dollars deposited into their bank accounts — and no matter what kind of person are, it’s hard to withstand such financial temptation. These huge sums of money could have been enough to provide daily meals for the hundreds of thousands of unemployed citizens in the country. Some government officials, who had become closely connected with the NLD group, also believed that if the NLD formed a government again, they would benefit from the prestige and personal gains that would come with promotions and influential positions. But now, realizing that such prospects are lost forever, they have turned to participating in the nation’s destruction efforts without hesitation or shame.
Effects based on causes
No matter what, everything must have a cause and effect. Why did they act this way? They did so because it served their interests. They would not act without some benefit. If the ultimate goal is said to be the encirclement, blockade, and destruction of China, then destabilizing neighbouring Myanmar — creating unrest and turning it into a battlefield — would be one stage of a broader plan aiming for the total collapse, designed by those who wish to see China’s downfall. To bring about the collapse of Myanmar, the first stage would be to incite mass public uprisings, stage protests, and provoke conflicts between the people and Tatmadaw. If necessary, the plan would escalate to arming internal armed groups to fight Tatmadaw. If further escalation were needed, foreign intervention under the pretext of R2P (Responsibility to Protect) could follow.
For such cases, it is necessary to recall and consider how political games were played by Tatmadaw, leading to the accusation of war crimes at the ICJ. To achieve this, electoral frauds were committed. The country’s destruction was intentionally carried out according to the desires of the Western bloc and George Soros. It can be said that they violated the Constitution of the nation and betrayed the country.
It caused the loss of billions in foreign currency and corruption; the collapse of national security systems; the decline and deterioration of religious and cultural values; the breakdown of unity among the people; and the deterioration of diplomatic relations with some countries leading to a loss of trust; and even the revocation of previously awarded honors and recognitions, resulting in a significant loss of leadership credibility.
Currently, as you know, people are experiencing the consequences and facing numerous new challenges while striving to maintain stability and rebuild unity. The mistakes made before the election are now turned into errors as consequences and all are bearing these consequences made by CPRH and NUG. The experiences and lessons learned by the people have become the foundation for any change they wish to bring about.
The future of Myanmar’s political issue is whether it will once again be swept by turbulent waves like in 1988 or the post-2021 period. At this moment, it is time to deeply consider the priorities. People are now fearful that they may once again face bitter consequences, whether the mistakes were committed knowingly or unknowingly, intentionally or unintentionally, and many would prefer to leave behind those who were responsible for past wrongs. From the breakdown of individuals to the collapse of the whole system, if the country is lost, the people and even the religion may disappear along with it. We, the people of Myanmar, must begin to worry and reflect on this reality.
Looking at the situations in Syria and Ukraine, it is clear that Myanmar should not become a battlefield. All must strive to save the country from becoming a failed state without allowing it to descend into war. Just as the pre-2020 conditions are no longer acceptable, the worsening post- 2021 conditions are also something the people no longer wish to endure. Rather than constantly preparing for conflict, it is now crucial to hand over power to those who envision peace and development for the country. The people themselves must no longer be easily swayed or manipulated into rising without clear thought and awareness.
Most of the Myanmar people tend to follow someone simply when they are persuaded by others, without carefully considering whether that person is truly capable, appropriate, or even right. This tendency is likely to swallow a coconut by applying lubricant to it, and such a mindset must now be abandoned. Especially among the youth, whose inexperience and energy make them vulnerable to manipulation, awareness is essential. What is truly important is for institutions that are vital to the nation to rise above ego, pride, and dismissive attitudes toward one another. Instead, it is time to genuinely understand and build respectful, cooperative relationships among them. Only then can the country move toward meaningful progress.
All, especially, should understand the duties of Tatmadaw that defend the Constitution. Whether it is liberal or democratic, one is right or one is wrong, while suspending democratic rights, and narrowing the media freedom, such doings make one a dictator.
When self-interest is prioritized, democracy and human rights are often cast aside — this is a lesson that must be recognized. It leads one to wonder whether a form of nationalist democracy might be more suitable for Myanmar than a loosely liberal, overly permissive version of democracy. Nationalism, being inherently at odds with globalism, is particularly relevant in today’s multipolar world, where a shift from globalization to regionalization is taking place. This evolving trend, as pointed out by the State Head, is something we must pay closer attention to.
It is important to note that, starting with “America First”, nationalist politics are gradually gaining strength in some parts of the world, with nationalistic leaders, parties, and governments becoming more prominent. Looking at how the American people continue to protect and preserve their national identity; we can see the need for many individuals in our own country who will strive to prevent issues — such as child adoption rights.
It is necessary to prevent the emergence of traitors who would surrender their own sovereignty or pledge allegiance to foreign interests and organizations, potentially turning others into slaves. “Study learned” is more valuable than “lesson learned”; only by opening our eyes and ears to the experiences of others, by learning for ourselves, and by making our own efforts to act accordingly, can we ensure that our nation’s future history will be clear and beautiful.
(Translated)
